This GMAT verbal practice question is a critical reasoning question. Concept tested: Evaluating the reasoning in an argument. A GMAT 650 to 700 level sample question. Evaluate the reasoning questions are modified forms of assumptions questions.
In an effort to curb drug abuse, the government has imposed strict laws to prosecute the dealers. However, such an initiative is unlikely to be effective. Prosecuting dealers will lead to a shortage of drugs. At the same time, because no efforts are being taken to curb demand, drugs will be sold at a premium, attracting more people to the very remunerative job of drug dealing. Therefore, to effectively reduce drug abuse, the government will have to prosecute the drug users and not dealers.
Which of the following is the most relevant information in evaluating the credibility of the argument?
The author believes that the government should prosecute drug users and not dealers in order to control drug abuse.
In order to evaluate the argument, the answer option has to evaluate this suggestion made by the author. So, the correct option would be one that determines one or all of the following
whether prosecuting drug users is possible
if possible, then will such a measure be as or more effective than prosecuting drug dealers
whether for some reason, the current steps taken by the government are effective in tackling drug abuse.
Option (A) can be eliminated because what worked in other countries need not necessarily work in this one. The answer option has to evaluate whether the recommendation would work in this particular scenario.
Option (B) can be eliminated because if the payoffs are outweighing the punishment, that would mean that there would be more dealers involved in drug dealing. The argument implies that this will already happen so this option does nothing to evaluate the author’s recommendation.
Option (C) does not evaluate whether drug abuse would reduce or increase. What needs to be evaluated is drug usage and not drug dealing. For similar reasons, Option (E) can also be eliminated. Keeping track of new dealers does not necessarily keep track of drug dealing or usage.
Option (D) evaluates the argument because the author’s primary argument against the government’s actions is that the current efforts will not curb drug usage, and that sale of drugs will continue happening at a premium. However, if most drug users do not wish to pay the premium charged, then the sale and usage of drugs will come down and the government’s current measures will prove to be effective enough.
Register in 2 easy steps and
Start learning in 5 minutes!
Next Batch June 18, 2023
GMAT Questionbank | Number Properties
GMAT Math Questions | Inequalities
GMAT Math Questions | Set Theory
GMAT Questions | Ratio, Percent, Fractions
GMAT Sample Questions | Rates - Work, Speed
GMAT Questions | Permutation & Probability
GMAT Sample Questions | Geometry
Copyrights © 2016 - 23 All Rights Reserved by Wizako.com - An Ascent Education Initiative.
GMAT® is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC). This website is not endorsed or approved by GMAC.
GRE® is a registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). This website is not endorsed or approved by ETS.
SAT® is a registered trademark of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse this product.
Wizako - GMAT, GRE, SAT Prep
An Ascent Education Initiative
14B/1 Dr Thirumurthy Nagar 1st Street
Chennai 600 034. India
Mobile: (91) 95000 48484
WhatsApp: WhatsApp Now
Leave A Message
TANCET Previous Year Question Papers
NCERT Solution for Class 10 Maths
CBSE Sample Papers for class 10